missed the alias when replying back.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: Thumb inline assembly
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
If the clobber-list is removed, the errors are on r1,r2, r3 and the
generated assembly code is ...
.thumb_func
.type check_reset_value, %function
check_reset_value:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 16
@ frame_needed = 1, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
push {r4, r7}
sub sp, sp, #16
add r7, sp, #0
str r0, [r7, #12]
str r1, [r7, #8]
str r2, [r7, #4]
ldr r1, [r7, #12]
ldr r0, [r7, #8]
movw r3, #49374
movt r3, 47789
movw r2, #49374
movt r2, 24589
ldr r4, [r7, #4]
@ 24 "nvic_reg_read.c" 1
ldr r2, =8 /* number of register */
ldr r1, =r1 /* load the nvic_iser* register */
read_reg:
sub r2, r2, #1
ldr r0, [r1]
add r1, r1, #4 /* go to the next register */
cmp r0, r0
beq read_reg_ok
ldr r3, =r3
str r3, [r4] /* update status flag */
read_reg_ok:
cmp r2, #0
bne read_reg
ldr r3, =r2
str r3, [r4] /* update status flag */
- here the push seems fine.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Do you mean push is not supported or the specific parameters used by
>> push in this code?
>>
>> But, from ARM's page, it seems the instruction is fine ...
>>
>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0283b/Babefbce.html
>
> That page says that in Thumb mode the push instruction only supports
> the lo registers.
>
> Ian
>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> .thumb_func
>>>
>>> This is a Thumb function.
>>>
>>>> push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8}
>>>
>>> As far as I know this is not a Thumb instruction.
>>>
>>> I don't know how this gets through the assembler.
>>>
>>> Ian
