Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
liferea depend on firefox-2.0.3, not 2.0.4 in FC8 rawhide
From
: Ken YANG
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: anyone willing to maintain xcalc?
From
: Nigel Jones
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
anyone willing to maintain xcalc?
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: thoughts about secondary architectures
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: proposal: new guidelines for rule makers
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Broken deps in Fedora 7
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: proposal: new guidelines for rule makers
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Patrice Dumas
proposal: new guidelines for rule makers
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: koji can't find a newly build dependency
From
: Patrice Dumas
Install Problems FC7
From
: Martin J Hooper
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: retiring gpg-pubkey packages
From
: Axel Thimm
No updates for FC7 via rsync
From
: Frank Büttner
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Re: Legality of Fedora in production environment
From
: Oleg Motienko
rawhide report: 20070601 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Potential errors in the KDE LiveCD
From
: Kelly
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
thoughts about secondary architectures
From
: Lennert Buytenhek
fedora for ARM
From
: Lennert Buytenhek
Re: How to request a new review for a package of mine?
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Peter Gordon
Re: [Fwd: Fedora Core 6 Update: lftp-3.5.9-0.fc6]
From
: Peter Gordon
Re: construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Peter Gordon
Re: Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Naheem Zaffar
Re: construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Kelly
Re: Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Naheem Zaffar
construct to do 'if not' in rpm specs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Jeremy Katz
Firefox 2.0 fails to install Flash 9 plugin
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Pekka Pietikainen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Pekka Pietikainen
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: chasd
Re: Sponsorship request for pybackpack
From
: Ruben Kerkhof
Re: koji weirdness
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: koji can't find a newly build dependency
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: koji can't find a newly build dependency
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: jesusr
Re: Feature idea: network based livecd installer
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: dragoran
koji can't find a newly build dependency
From
: Patrice Dumas
Sponsorship request for pybackpack
From
: Andrew Price
Re: Unsigned packages (ntfs-config)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: David Nielsen
Unsigned packages (ntfs-config)
From
: Naheem Zaffar
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: mock config files for Fedora 7? mock building on FC6 for F7 packages?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: David Woodhouse
mock config files for Fedora 7? mock building on FC6 for F7 packages?
From
: Eric Smith
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: seth vidal
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: chasd
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry beforeF8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Feature idea: network based livecd installer
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: seth vidal
Re: updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: RFE: use nasa worldwind for timezone selection (i.e. my first reaction to F7)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: disagreement in a merge review about patches
From
: Bill Nottingham
updates, updates-testing and comps
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Doncho N. Gunchev
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Robert Relyea
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Feature idea: network based livecd installer
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Will Woods
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Will Woods
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Feature idea: package an installer image as a grub entry before F8. Was [ Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree ]
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2007-06-01
From
: buildsys
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Brendan Conoboy
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Meaningless name
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Meaningless name
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Will Woods
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jesse Keating
retiring gpg-pubkey packages
From
: Steve G
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Firewall configuration tool: system-config-firewall
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Firewall configuration tool: system-config-firewall
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Firewall configuration tool: system-config-firewall
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Steve G
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Will Woods
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jesse Keating
Firewall configuration tool: system-config-firewall
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: Testing update announcements
From
: Will Woods
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Steve G
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Re: RFE: use nasa worldwind for timezone selection (i.e. my first reaction to F7)
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jon Ciesla
re: Automate time zone selection
From
: Gianluca Cecchi
Don't put new packages through updates-testing
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Mirroring tools
From
: David Timms
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Re: X-Chat in Fedora
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: disagreement in a merge review about patches
From
: Steve G
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Richard Hughes
Testing update announcements
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Frank Schmitt
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Steve G
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Emmanuel Seyman
Re: Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How to request a new review for a package of mine?
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Kevin Kofler
Automate time zone selection (Was: RFE: use nasa worldwind...)
From
: Martin Sourada
How to request a new review for a package of mine?
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jon Ciesla
RFE: use nasa worldwind for timezone selection (i.e. my first reaction to F7)
From
: Jane Dogalt
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Missing pkgs in F7!?
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Missing pkgs in F7!?
From
: Oliver Falk
Missing pkgs in F7!?
From
: Oliver Falk
Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2007-06-01
From
: buildsys
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: disagreement in a merge review about patches
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Matthias Saou
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Rahul Sundaram
disagreement in a merge review about patches
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Oliver Falk
Very much packages with fc6 tag instead of fc7 in the FC7 tree
From
: Frank Büttner
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: Koji - Trouble building for F-7
From
: Ray Van Dolson
Re: Koji - Trouble building for F-7
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Upcoming FESCo Election
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Multilib doc packages
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: hwinfo?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Multilib doc packages
From
: orion
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Dennis Gilmore
hwinfo?
From
: Kelly
Re: Pidgin problem
From
: A S Alam
Mirroring tools
From
: orion
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Brendan Conoboy
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Stuart Children
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Meaningless name
From
: Michael Thomas
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
Koji - Trouble building for F-7
From
: Ray Van Dolson
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Emmanuel Seyman
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Reverted in devel too (was: Re: Reverted for F-7, feedback wanted for devel)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Dave Jones
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Dave Jones
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-31
From
: Fedora Extras repoclosure
Re: Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Reverted in devel too (was: Re: Reverted for F-7, feedback wanted for devel)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Meaningless name (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: xchat-2.8.2-desktop.patch
From
: Rex Dieter
Reverted in devel too (was: Re: Reverted for F-7, feedback wanted for devel)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rpms/xchat/devel xchat-2.8.2-desktop.patch, NONE, 1.1 xchat.spec, 1.62, 1.63 xchat-2.4.2-nickmenu-away-msg.patch, 1.2, NONE xchat-2.4.3-lib64.patch,1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-multiline-messages.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-redhat-desktop.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.0-dbus-api.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-es.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-fi.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-nonblock.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-gnome-open-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-htmlview-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: koji weirdness
From
: Mike Bonnet
Reverted for F-7, feedback wanted for devel (was: Re: rpms/xchat/devel ...)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rpms/xchat/devel xchat-2.8.2-desktop.patch, NONE, 1.1 xchat.spec, 1.62, 1.63 xchat-2.4.2-nickmenu-away-msg.patch, 1.2, NONE xchat-2.4.3-lib64.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-multiline-messages.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-redhat-desktop.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.0-dbus-api.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-es.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-fi.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-nonblock.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-gnome-open-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-htmlview-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: koji doesn't support https?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Schlaegel
Re: koji doesn't support https?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rpms/xchat/devel xchat-2.8.2-desktop.patch, NONE, 1.1 xchat.spec, 1.62, 1.63 xchat-2.4.2-nickmenu-away-msg.patch, 1.2, NONE xchat-2.4.3-lib64.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-multiline-messages.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.4.4-redhat-desktop.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.0-dbus-api.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-es.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-fi.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-nonblock.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-gnome-open-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE xchat-2.6.6-simplify-to-use-htmlview-for-default-webbrowser.patch, 1.1, NONE
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: koji doesn't support https?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: koji doesn't support https?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
koji doesn't support https?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Pete Graner
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: seth vidal
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Benjamin Lewis
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Nicolas Antonio Corrarello
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: David Nielsen
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Matthias Saou
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: David Hollis
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jon Ciesla
Fedora 8 Schedule
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Matthias Saou
Re: First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Jon Ciesla
First impressions of a system update with yum
From
: Matthias Saou
Re: pxe
From
: Michael DeHaan
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: bad link or some error on fedoraproject.org page
From
: David Nielsen
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/7 ?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Upcoming FESCo Election
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: FreeTDS (legal)
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: idiots guide to fedora contribution?
From
: Dan Horák
Re: FreeTDS (legal)
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: idiots guide to fedora contribution?
From
: Dan Horák
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: idiots guide to fedora contribution?
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
bad link or some error on fedoraproject.org page
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
idiots guide to fedora contribution?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2007-05-30
From
: Michael Schwendt
[Fwd: Fedora Core 6 Update: lftp-3.5.9-0.fc6]
From
: John DeDourek
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: FreeTDS (legal)
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
FreeTDS
From
: James K. Lowden
Re: desktop-file-install question
From
: Rex Dieter
[SPAM] Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Patrice Dumas
desktop-file-install question
From
: Neal Becker
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: J French
Re: Pidgin problem
From
: David Hunter
SuperSavage/IXC 64 woes
From
: Joachim Frieben
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
FC6 and F7rc2 poweroff problem on server HP ML110
From
: Dario Lesca
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Release time for fedora 7
From
: Michael Weiner
Today rawhide update
From
: Adam Tkac
Re: Release time for fedora 7
From
: Nicu Buculei
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Release time for fedora 7
From
: Carbone, Adam
Re: trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Eric Smith
Re: Project hosting?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: [Suspend-devel] willing to contribute - so laptops suspend better - but how?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Valent Turkovic
Project hosting?
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Warren Togami
Re: trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Web-only release notes deadline 30 May 23:59 UTC
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Eric Smith
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2007-05-30
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Eric Smith
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Jesse Keating
trouble using mock on FC6-x86_64 to build an i386 rpm for FC6
From
: Eric Smith
Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2007-05-30
From
: buildsys
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Blizzard
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Jima
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Michael Schwendt
Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2007-05-30
From
: buildsys
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Bojan Smojver
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 6 - 2007-05-30
From
: Fedora Extras repoclosure
Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2007-05-30
From
: Fedora Extras repoclosure
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: A couple of serious questions
From
: Jane Dogalt
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: OCaml
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: OCaml (was: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting)
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: 32bit to 64bit "update" (was: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting)
From
: Bill Rugolsky Jr.
Re: OCaml (was: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting)
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
OCaml (was: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
32bit to 64bit "update" (was: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting)
From
: Matthias Saou
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Kelly
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: download server layout
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: download server layout
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: download server layout
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Kelly
Re: Extras suggestion: vde + Qtemu
From
: Ville Skyttä
Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: download server layout
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: download server layout
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Pekka Pietikainen
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Chris Brown
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: download server layout
From
: Jesse Keating
download server layout
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Scribus 1.3.4
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: Scribus 1.3.4
From
: Chris Brown
Re: Scribus 1.3.4
From
: Jon Ciesla
Scribus 1.3.4
From
: Ian Malone
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Nigel Metheringham
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Chris Brown
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Chris Brown
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Brian Pepple
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: sangu
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Hikaru Amano
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: David Nielsen
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Lumens
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Chris Brown
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Harry Hoffman
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From
: Hikaru Amano
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Lumens
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Joachim Frieben
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Steve Hill
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Steve Hill
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Steve Hill
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Joachim Frieben
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Steve Hill
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: shiny desktop, anyone?
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Oliver Falk
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Mark McLoughlin
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: David Nielsen
Re: rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: koji weirdness
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: Patrice Dumas
rawhide report: 20070530 changes
From
: Build System
Re: A couple of serious questions
From
: Kelly
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: A couple of serious questions
From
: Arthur Pemberton
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: Extras suggestion: vde + Qtemu
From
: KH KH
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Chris Weyl
Extras suggestion: vde + Qtemu
From
: Gerry Reno
Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: koji weirdness
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: Audacious - Illegal Instruction (Livna)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: koji weirdness
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
