Le vendredi 01 juin 2007 à 17:07 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:33 +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:58:07PM +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > > I hear KDE 4.1 is aimed at being a 6 month release, this would then mean > > > we align nicely for a F9 with KDE4 and GNOME 2.22. That would accomplice > > > the goal of adjusting the schedule which was aimed for rather nicely.. > > > provided neither projects slips their release date. > > Why does the KDE spin have to be released at the same time as the general > > GNOME-oriented release? > > The reason is that the distro as a whole has a release at that time, not > just The GNOME spin or KDE spin, Server Spin, or etc. Also there's no way packagers would accept to freeze fedora-devel twice at a month interval to accommodate a spin on a different schedule. So you'd have the choice of starting from a month-old devel fork (which is 1/6th of a typical release cycle, and getting stale) or try to restabilize devel alone (devel breaks very fast after a release because everyone is fed up with waiting and pushes his pet unstable feature as soon as it's unfrozen) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
