On 30 May 2007, at 15:39, Chris Brown wrote:
Sun's Java is the only package I know of then that uses wrapping of an rpm in a binary file simply in order to force users to read the license agreement. Its a bit of a non-issue anyway what with the releasing of Java under the GPL.
That particular one pisses me off so I take it as a challenge - fortunately extracting the rpm out of the blob is pretty easy.
On 30 May 2007, at 14:43, Jesse Keating wrote:
RPM installation/updates must be non-interactive. Period.
Absolutely. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
