ons, 30 05 2007 kl. 21:26 +0800, skrev Hikaru Amano: > I'm not sure if i missed it .. anyway .. here goes > > it would be useful to Third Parties if RPM have the ability to ask for > License Agreement before installing their package. I'm not a lawyer > but I believe this is useful in legal related stuff when distributing > softwares. I have seen a few RPM that are stored .bin just for the > sake of license agreement (Sun Java is the easiest example) and with > RPM having (optional) license agreement before installation , this > would reduce their worries bout licensing when packaging app for > Linux. > > and ... Linux newbies can avoid the terminal more (I know this sounds > silly, the moment somebody says open terminal and run "chmod +x > file.bin", certain users freaks out , double clicking RPM is easier to > explain ). You already agree to the OSI approved licenses when you install Fedora as I understand our installer. Since this is all we provide, why would we need these debian'ish interrupted installs which would entirely break automated updates? - David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
