Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote:
I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I
am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly
prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't
officially support.  It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do.

And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base. *cough* ppc

Quit hating on my powerbook. At least until I get something x86_64 to replace it...

--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux