-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2007 03:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:25:54 Chris Lumens wrote: >>> 4) Red Hat/Fedora doesn't have any Alphas around? >> Well, a lot of us have one collecting dust in the closet (or acting as >> a stand for a Power Mac...) but I don't know that RH itself has any >> Alphas. > > And Red Hat shouldn't be the de-facto provider of your secondary hardware. > Part of the point here is that if we're going ot have these arches, there is > going to need to be a community keeping them going. The work and burden > shouldn't always fall back on Red Hat as it has in the past. We don't want > to be like the other distros that are pooping out arch support just so that > they can list something else on their webpage. If we're going to have an > arch, it needs to be a viable and active community who will be self > sufficient. We're providing the tools and software infrastructure to make > their arch happen, but they need to bring people and machines. Oh... Jesse, you didn't get me correct. I don't want RH to actually DO the hosting/housing/whatever for us. I was just wondering if there are any Alphas around, that could be (re-)used. And yes, I was also asking, if RH want's to house/host/buy some Alphas, if they want to do so fine, if not, that's also OK. - -of -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXYLUxWN5Ge8lKUMRAg7hAKCMOFso9UKHRwtdrbO+X2eZKNf4JACeMljl rbRVnXmB0ps+dcu8jM3PjB4= =92g4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
