Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
From: Chris Lumens <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:25:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <465D4A19.8030601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1180473516.6254.454.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <465D4A19.8030601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

> 4) Red Hat/Fedora doesn't have any Alphas around?

Well, a lot of us have one collecting dust in the closet (or acting as
a stand for a Power Mac...) but I don't know that RH itself has any
Alphas.

- Chris

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
  - From: Jesse Keating

References:
- For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
  - From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
  - From: Oliver Falk

Prev by Date: Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
Next by Date: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
Previous by thread: Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
Next by thread: Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]