On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:25:54 Chris Lumens wrote: > > 4) Red Hat/Fedora doesn't have any Alphas around? > > Well, a lot of us have one collecting dust in the closet (or acting as > a stand for a Power Mac...) but I don't know that RH itself has any > Alphas. And Red Hat shouldn't be the de-facto provider of your secondary hardware. Part of the point here is that if we're going ot have these arches, there is going to need to be a community keeping them going. The work and burden shouldn't always fall back on Red Hat as it has in the past. We don't want to be like the other distros that are pooping out arch support just so that they can list something else on their webpage. If we're going to have an arch, it needs to be a viable and active community who will be self sufficient. We're providing the tools and software infrastructure to make their arch happen, but they need to bring people and machines. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpGlnvEGtO1l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
