Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Also, please keep the explicit assurance that PowerPC won't be shifted
> > to 'secondary' status before one other architecture has shown that it
> > can work.
> 
> I don't recall ever making such an assurance. Frankly, I think ppc
> would be a great guinea pig for this.

We had said that moving PPC to a secondary arch would be done after (for
example) sparc was up and running as such.  Way back when this was first
proposed.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux