Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I
> am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly
> prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't
> officially support.  It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do.

And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially 
supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base.  *cough* ppc

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpwZcvmQeLcQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux