On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote: > I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I > am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly > prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't > officially support. It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do. And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base. *cough* ppc -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpwZcvmQeLcQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
