On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:49 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote: > > I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I > > am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly > > prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't > > officially support. It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do. > > And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially > supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base. *cough* ppc +1 /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
