Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:49 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> 
> And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us
> 'officially 
> supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base.
> *cough* ppc 

ppc might be a small part of our user base, but at least it's very easy
to get something that's fast and well supported.  Of the arches we're
talking about ppc is clearly the one that is one that is most grey.
Arm?  Sparc?  Other?  I don't think anyone has any illusions about
whether or not those are secondary arches. :)

--Chris

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux