On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 19:35 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:49 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us > > 'officially supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base. > > *cough* ppc > > ppc might be a small part of our user base, but at least it's very easy > to get something that's fast and well supported. Of the arches we're > talking about ppc is clearly the one that is one that is most grey. > Arm? Sparc? Other? I don't think anyone has any illusions about > whether or not those are secondary arches. :) If the Cabal is going to decree that we're going to abandon good engineering practice and let partially-failed builds make it through into the repository without even a cursory inspection by the packager, then there's a lot to be said for ensuring that our "primary arches" include at least something 32-bit, something 64-bit, something little-endian and something big-endian. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
