On Wednesday 30 May 2007 10:18:55 David Woodhouse wrote: > I see no reason to believe that it _would_ "hinder the progress of > Fedora on the primary arches". We've seen very little evidence of that > so far. As I said, I think you're 'solving' a problem that doesn't > exist. I just simply don't agree with you. I've _seen_ it hinder the ability to get a release out, or a package update out. I've _seen_ packages sit unbuildable for hours if not days until the one person with arch specific knowledge can look into whats going on. Every new package will have to be 'bootstrapped' into an arch. I can't expect new Fedora contributors to be completely stalled on getting software into Fedora, into the hands of millions of users simply because the software doesn't build for some obscure arch that somebody is working on getting going for Fedora, that has at most a couple hundred users. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpskZqu41kIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
