David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:00 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > > In other words, by only failing a build when a primary arch fails, we > > enable the inclusion of many other architectures for those who care > > about them, without imposing additional burdens on all maintainers > > (who may not care about them). > > We have that already. The existing policy, allowing ExcludeArch but > requiring a bug to be filed, works extremely well. That policy was for *PRIMARY* arches. We are talking about secondary arches here; the arches that Fedora, as a general project, does not feel is within its release mantra to support, but wants to maintain the ability for communities to support if they so desire. The conditions will *and should* be different. Fedora is about getting new open-source technology into the hands of users and developers. It's not about insisting a community help people support their particular CPU fetishes for little return. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
