David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > It might be OK to allow the bug to be filed _after_ the build failure, > explaining the reason for the failure and why it's outside the > capabilities of the package maintainer to fix it. Then the package could > be pushed for the architectures for which it _did_ build. But I don't > see any real advantage to that over the current system; it's just more > complexity. Because, realistically, I don't want secondary arches to hold up development work in the cases where: - gcc breaks for X number of days - the architecture maintainers go AWOL - the hosting provider for said secondary arches goes AWOL Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
