On 5/29/07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see no reason why failed builds should be pushed to the repo without the maintainer even bothering to look at the failure and file a bug explaining it. Once an architecture is up and running, 'new' build failures on that arch really aren't very common -- and when they do happen, they're usually the responsibility of the package maintainer rather than something the arch experts need to look in to anyway.
I think i agree with you on this. I think a build failure needs to result in some definitive action so that the appropriate group can figure out how to fix it. If the maintainer decides to excludearch that arch... then so be it...but its then at least documented for later investigation. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
