Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 5/29/07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see no reason why failed builds should be pushed to the repo without
the maintainer even bothering to look at the failure and file a bug
explaining it. Once an architecture is up and running, 'new' build
failures on that arch really aren't very common -- and when they do
happen, they're usually the responsibility of the package maintainer
rather than something the arch experts need to look in to anyway.
I think i agree with you on this. I think a build failure needs to
result in some definitive action so that the appropriate group can
figure out how to fix it. If the maintainer decides to excludearch
that arch... then so be it...but its then at least documented for
later investigation.
+1 - let's keep things documented.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
