Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/29/07, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
afaik, that's already current practice (ie, ExcludeArch requires a bug
to be filed).

right.... so lets do the same for secondary arches for now. If it
becomes clear that builds blow up a lot for secondary arches causing
widespread headaches for maintainers trying to get updates out to
primary arches we can consider adopting the policy that secondary arch
build failures don't fail the whole build.

-jef

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux