On 5/29/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 17:10 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> Sounds like a good process to me; opens up the buildsys to more arches
> w/o imposing more work (on anyone who isn't wanting that work, at
> least).
That's a bit of bad statement. I'm not wanting to do work to fix things
on x86, but I do. The purpose of secondary arches isn't to get people
out of work. It's to allow the base to move forward for the majority of
Fedora users.
I never said anything about getting "people out of work"; rather, I
was commenting on how this proposal allows Fedora on non-primary
arches to move forward without generating additional workload for each
maintainer.
I rather suspect we're saying the same thing, but from two different
directions :)
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
