On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:00 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > In other words, by only failing a build when a primary arch fails, we > enable the inclusion of many other architectures for those who care > about them, without imposing additional burdens on all maintainers > (who may not care about them). > > Otherwise, why bother making a distinction at all? Precisely. Now, when a build fails on a secondary arch, it won't be silent. Emails will go out to the architecture team, as well as a daily summary to fedora-devel-list on a per-arch basis (e.g. I built these packages sucessfully, I tried to build these, but they failed). ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
