On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 17:06 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > If QA can be bypassed then that reduces the incentive to form the team > > in the first place. > > I'm not saying QA should be bypassed, I'm saying that delaying packages for a > week to allow testing by a non existent team is silly. I said this before, but it is _at most_ a week. Since we have no experience with this yet we can't say for sure, but the actual turn around time for things that _get comments_ on the updates-testing in bodhi will likely go much sooner than a week. > >> All I'm asking for is to leaving this to the packagers discretion, > >> isn't Fedora supposed to be all about freedom? Then why put me in a > >> straight jacket. > > > > It is not all about freedom though. There are several other factors that > > influence a decision. > > > > Factors such as? I thought freedom was the great good which we are all working for. Factors such as end user stability. Users don't exist to serve packagers. It's the other way around. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
