Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
From: Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:43:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <c44298520705300626ue18f674m802b9cccc89787c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <c44298520705300626ue18f674m802b9cccc89787c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6

On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:26:39 Hikaru Amano wrote:
> any comments?

RPM installation/updates must be non-interactive.  Period.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpr2qOFvLhEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
  - From: Hikaru Amano

Prev by Date: Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
Next by Date: Re: if this is a bug then it is a nasty BLOCKER for F7
Previous by thread: Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
Next by thread: Re: An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux