On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 13:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 20:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> Not true many reviewers review on the latest stable, it says nowhere > >>> that a review should be done on rawhide. > >> Review is about guidelines and nowhere in the guideline does it even say > >> that the fucntionality of the package should be tested. When I suggested > >> that it be added I got back a knee jerk reaction to participate in > >> reviews myself. > >> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines:: > > > > - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as > > described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for > > example. > > I suggested that it the "SHOULD" be changed to "MUST". A package that > doesnt even start shouldnt be getting past reviews. 1. packages never start, applications do. 2. many applications, when being cluelessly used, only mean they have a functional "usage()" 3. You can't launch anything in library packages. SCNR Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
