Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 13:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 20:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Not true many reviewers review on the latest stable, it says nowhere
that a review should be done on rawhide.
Review is about guidelines and nowhere in the guideline does it even say
that the fucntionality of the package should be tested. When I suggested
that it be added I got back a knee jerk reaction to participate in
reviews myself.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines::
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for
example.
I suggested that it the "SHOULD" be changed to "MUST". A package that
doesnt even start shouldnt be getting past reviews.
1. packages never start, applications do.
Pendantic waste.
2. many applications, when being cluelessly used, only mean they have a
functional "usage()"
Which covers base functionality.
3. You can't launch anything in library packages.
Irrelevant to this rule then.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
