Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 13:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 20:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Not true many reviewers review on the latest stable, it says
nowhere that a review should be done on rawhide.
Review is about guidelines and nowhere in the guideline does it
even say that the fucntionality of the package should be tested.
When I suggested that it be added I got back a knee jerk reaction
to participate in reviews myself.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines::
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for
example.
I suggested that it the "SHOULD" be changed to "MUST". A package that
doesnt even start shouldnt be getting past reviews.
1. packages never start, applications do.
Pendantic waste.
2. many applications, when being cluelessly used, only mean they have a
functional "usage()"
Which covers base functionality.
Ralf wrote in reply to this: "<beep> - You apparently don't have any clues
about what you are talking about."
I do not agree with the beep, but let me stress the point:
"You apparently don't have any clues about what you are talking about."
What Ralf means with:
>> 2. many applications, when being cluelessly used, only mean they have a
>> functional "usage()"
And which should be fully understandable by anyone who claims to have enough
domain knowledge to discuss and decide policies, is that if a reviewer just
runs app foo like this:
foo <enter>
That changes then are large the user will see something like:
usage: foo [opt] <input-file> or <output-file>
Which sure does NOT cover basic functionality. First please get a clue about
what we are talking about (by say packaging 30 packages?) and then return to
this discussion.
Thank you for first getting a clue,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
