Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > This is a very early draft of what I am planning on presenting to FESCo
> > in the near future:
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures
> > 
> > I am very interested in comments and suggested changes.
> 
> How are we handling builds if the arch is not hosted in the colo? Do
> builders have to be publically available? How much slower is it
> going to be if it's pulling the repository from far far away.

Yes, builders will need to be publicly available.

There will surely be some delay depending on the "net distance" from the
colo.

> File Storage - Right this very second, we don't have the space.
> 
> Do we have fake-build-provides to handle architecture-specifc build
> requirements? Is it needed?

I don't think it is needed at this time.

~spot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux