Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:08 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Push what anyway ? 

"Push the kernel build for i386 anyway, despite the fact that it failed
on one or two other architectures".

> Pushing half the completed x86 builds sounds like a really bad idea.
> (Having seen the fallout already from dependancies on all archs
> having the same version kernel in the repo).

You may be right. Pushing a partially-failed build would be at the
_option_ of the package maintainer. Others want it to happen
automatically even before the maintainer looks over the failure --
which I believe is completely insane.

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux