David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:08 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: "Push the kernel build for i386 anyway, despite the fact that it failed on one or two other architectures".
There is no build for i386 if something fails. As in any RPMs that may have been created get deleted, the builds for any unfinished subtasks are cancelled, and appropriate fail notices sent out to the CLI and via e-mail.
Doing this any other way will lead to inconsistencies in the primary repos. The latest foo would be foo-1.2 on one arch and maybe foo-1.3 on another. Having these inconsistencies in the build root will then become one big mess as nobody would be able to sanely say what version of foo any given package would be compiled against -- and might cause more failures if API/ABI changes in the foo package.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
