On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:07 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:00 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > > In other words, by only failing a build when a primary arch fails, we > > enable the inclusion of many other architectures for those who care > > about them, without imposing additional burdens on all maintainers > > (who may not care about them). > > We have that already. The existing policy, allowing ExcludeArch but > requiring a bug to be filed, works extremely well. As Jakub pointed out, there is a burden - having to wait for the slower arches to complete a build. I was under the impression that that was one of the main things that secondary arches was intended to fix. Couldn't we have automatic ExcludeArch bug filing when a build fails on a secondary arch? Cheers, Mark. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
