On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:30 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > As Jakub pointed out, there is a burden - having to wait for > the slower > arches to complete a build. I was under the impression that that was > one > of the main things that secondary arches was intended to fix. > > Couldn't we have automatic ExcludeArch bug filing when a build > fails on > a secondary arch? > I think that just having a tool that keeps track of who is behind (a build buddy system, if you will?) is probably enough and let package maintainers and arch experts figure out the issues. --Chris -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
