disagreement in a merge review about patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I am in disagreement with Marcela in 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529
It is about the patches, and it begins here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529#c15

My point is that the patches are unreviewable and cannot be given to
upstream or shared among packagers when upstream is dead, because some
patches touch the same code, leading to something that isn't readable.
Marcela disagrees because then there won't be a one patch one bug
relationship. My advice is to keep the patches to have this one patch
one bug relationship, but don't apply tem and instead have a one patch
one functionality instead.

Advices?

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux