Re: For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 30 May 2007 10:59:52 David Woodhouse wrote:
> Allowing partially-failed builds to make it through into the repo
> without user intervention is insane. Failures should _always_ be
> investigated.

If there is nobody around for that secondary arch to investigate why the build 
failed on that secondary arch, does that secondary arch need to continue 
existing?  It is entirely up to the community wanting to support $ARCH to be 
on the hook to fix problems that arise in $ARCH.  They should not just pass 
that off on the package maintainer if said package maintainer isn't part of 
the $ARCH movement already.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpEqC3UCDYiw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux