On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:22:52AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Exactly, there are very good reasons why this is a SHOULD and not a MUST. > I'm sure almost every reviewer will give a program a test run in the simple > program case / scenarion. Why must everything by regulated with rules, > procedures and more rules? Why can't we just TRUST each other, I'm getting > very tired, sick even, of this! We need rules to enforce best practices, but I can only agree with you that during the merge there has been a lot more procedures and choices are increasingly being removed from the maintainers hands to go to specific groups. I think this is a very bad direction. I am not saying that there shouldn't be a control (mainly from the rel-eng group, from fesco for packaging issues...) but the choice should always be in the packager hands. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
