GCC Help
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stop gcc
- From: Adrien Nader <adrien@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: stop gcc
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stop gcc
- From: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- stop gcc
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC needs YOU!
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc build error
- From: Jason yang <red.wolf.s.husband@xxxxxxxxx>
- Applying -fno-builtin-xxx / -ffreestanding via pragama GCC / attribute optimize
- From: Jeff Epler <jepler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (nessun oggetto)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- (nessun oggetto)
- From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- .gcno files no longer generated by -fprofile-generate since GCC 4.4
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enhance isatty() for GCC for use with GNU make?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enhance isatty() for GCC for use with GNU make?
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enhance isatty() for GCC for use with GNU make?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enhance isatty() for GCC for use with GNU make?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Enhance isatty() for GCC for use with GNU make?
- From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Optimising away memset() calls?
- From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@xxxxxxxxx>
- Build failure bash2.05b OSX10.4
- From: Geoff Down <geoffdown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Solved
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Solved
- From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Question
- From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- A possible bug
- From: Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: unspec in machine description file
- From: Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Local variables used inside an asm block are not recognized as used
- From: Daniel Kamil Kozar <dkk089@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Local variables used inside an asm block are not recognized as used
- From: David Wohlferd <dw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC needs YOU!
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC needs YOU!
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Local variables used inside an asm block are not recognized as used
- From: Daniel Kamil Kozar <dkk089@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: #error "Unable to find a suitable type for HOST_WIDE_INT"
- From: Vladimír Fuka <vladimir.fuka@xxxxxxxxx>
- Undefined reference in libcommon, libbacktrace GCC 4.8 bootstrap
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- #error "Unable to find a suitable type for HOST_WIDE_INT"
- From: Vladimír Fuka <vladimir.fuka@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling for arm-none-eabi, but BFD doesn't support it.
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Compiling for arm-none-eabi, but BFD doesn't support it.
- From: Rena <hyperhacker@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.8 Build Error 2 gcc/nm: exec: line -89: -pg not found
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- std::string clobbers memory when compiling without optimizations
- From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crossed native compiler
- From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- -fdebug-prefix-map sometimes randomly has no effect?
- From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crossed native compiler
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crossed native compiler
- From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crossed native compiler
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Crossed native compiler
- From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Compiling with -fdata-sections doesn't put the constant in the section expected
- From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: convert main to Function
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- convert main to Function
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why __gthread_active_p() is checked only in few functions?
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- PPC E500v2 cross-compiler pthread_cancel aborting
- From: "Carr, Chris (GE Intelligent Platforms)" <chris.carr@xxxxxx>
- Re: conversions betwwen function pointers and their calls
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- conversions betwwen function pointers and their calls
- From: Dima Sorkin <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc-help Digest 27 Sep 2014 11:46:57 -0000 Issue 4675
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.7 on Android G++ Compiler Build Fail "This Linker Not Config To Use Sysroots"
- From: Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC vectorization of math functions similar to what LLVM does...
- From: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Program will crash after using gcov
- From: Nan Xiao <xiaonan830818@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-unknown-cygwin
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Program will crash after using gcov
- From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC vectorization of math functions similar to what LLVM does...
- From: leon zadorin <leonleon77@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problems bootstrapping GCC on x86_64-unknown-cygwin
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Program will crash after using gcov
- From: Nan Xiao <xiaonan830818@xxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] ICE in get_narrower, at tree.c:8532
- From: Marcin Sobieszczanski <marciso.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Finding positions of the instructions
- From: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
- From: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Register Variables in c
- From: Kayven Riese <kayvey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mtlo/mflo instructions when issue width is increased (MIPS 5kc)
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- MinGW Windows-specific linking warnings
- From: Patrick Plenefisch <phplenefisch@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Register Variables in c
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran
- From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is accessing floating-point register slower than accessing cache-memory?
- From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Register Variables in c
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Restricted user account creation in bugzila.
- From: Marcin Sobieszczanski <marciso.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is accessing floating-point register slower than accessing cache-memory?
- From: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Register Variables in c
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Register Variables in c
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is accessing floating-point register slower than accessing cache-memory?
- From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mtlo/mflo instructions when issue width is increased (MIPS 5kc)
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- mtlo/mflo instructions when issue width is increased (MIPS 5kc)
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran
- From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Possible bug in gcc 4.4.7
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Undefined symbol .LC531 during linker check gcc 3.4.5-p5 - c++ file compilation/linking
- From: "Sairam Rangaswamy -X (sairanga - ARICENT TECHNOLOGIES MAURIITIUS LIMITED at Cisco)" <sairanga@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Error compiling GCC 4.8.3 on OSX 10.10
- From: Adnan RIHAN <axel50397@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using LINK_SPEC to pass rpath to linker
- From: Kenneth Chiu <kchiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- VLE support for powerpc e200zX family cpus.
- From: "Raza, Saqlain" <Saqlain_Raza@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- conversion warning bug?
- From: Hariharan Sandanagobalane <hariharan.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting the dynamic linker with an environment variable
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Changing Mantissa's Width in Non-IEEE Floating Point implementation
- From: Sheheryar Qazi <sherry1.sherry1@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- Re: Setting the dynamic linker with an environment variable
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting the dynamic linker with an environment variable
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Increase the size of allocated memory space for basic blocks
- From: Yue Chen <ychen.contact@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Debugging test failure during SLES 12 build
- From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Setting the dynamic linker with an environment variable
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- Setting the dynamic linker with an environment variable
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- lib64 and --disable-multilib
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Exclude /lib and /usr/lib from the library search path
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
- MIPS 5kc backend - single issue or limited dual issue
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Melvin Blades <melvin.blades@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling project with g++ built in
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Register spill caused by gcc scheduler?
- From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling project with g++ built in
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Compiling project with g++ built in
- From: Phil Freeman <eyeball_entertainment@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andy Webber <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andy Webber <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andy Webber <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- is portable aliasing possible in C++?
- From: Andy Webber <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unspec in machine description file
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Melvin Blades <melvin.blades@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unspec in machine description file
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cc1: undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Melvin Blades <melvin.blades@xxxxxxxxx>
- unspec in machine description file
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cc1: undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cc1: undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
- cc1: undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling GCC for different machine on same Architecture
- From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling GCC for different machine on same Architecture
- From: Jaya Pavan Bhattiprolu <pavanbhattiprolu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling GCC for different machine on same Architecture
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Compiling GCC for different machine on same Architecture
- From: Jaya Pavan Bhattiprolu <pavanbhattiprolu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Printing out of a C-programm
- From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
- Re: GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC --with-sysroot: libintl.h: No such file or directory
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Monitoring reads to members of global_options
- From: Mateus Borges <mab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: little questions
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- little questions
- From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Printing out of a C-programm
- From: "Christoph K." <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Printing out of a C-programm
- From: "Jakob Bucher" <jbbob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Specify location of glibc libraries
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc-4.9.1 m32c-elf: unable to find a register to spill in class 'A_REGS'
- From: Galen Seitz <galens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: odd behavior
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: odd behavior
- From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: odd behavior
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: odd behavior
- From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL'
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- odd behavior
- From: Michael Williamson <michael.h.williamson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- error: expected declaration specifiers before 'ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL'
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Glibc headers in one directory and linux headers in another
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing unused functions during final link
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- removing unused functions during final link
- From: Melvin Blades <melvin.blades@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux unable to find the correct gcc
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.9.1 Submodel Options / Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options not set for target
- From: Andreas Baumgaertner <andreas.baumgaertner@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux unable to find the correct gcc
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux unable to find the correct gcc
- From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux unable to find the correct gcc
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Utilizing GCC Prefetch Analysis -- Instructions not being generated
- From: Malek Musleh <malek.musleh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Utilizing GCC Prefetch Analysis -- Instructions not being generated
- From: Malek Musleh <malek.musleh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linkage order
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linkage order
- From: "Hauke Krüger(IND)" <krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linkage order
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Linkage order
- From: "Hauke Krüger(IND)" <krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: init_priority attribute and libstdc++
- From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- init_priority attribute and libstdc++
- From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++11 - Parameter pack question
- From: Sidney Marshall <sidneym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++11 - Parameter pack question
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- C++11 - Parameter pack question
- From: Sidney Marshall <sidneym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: wifstream
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: wifstream
- From: ArbolOne <ArbolOne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: wifstream
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- wifstream
- From: ArbolOne <ArbolOne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help with fusing multiple dependent ops in gcc combine pass
- From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
- help with fusing multiple dependent ops in gcc combine pass
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Corruption in C++ constructor
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Corruption in C++ constructor
- From: Andrew Bell <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Corruption in C++ constructor
- From: navin p <navinp1281@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [gcov] No data gathered for child processes
- From: Scott Spivak <scott.spivak@xxxxxx>
- Re: libXcursor + -finline-functions: Invalid read of size 4
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libXcursor + -finline-functions: Invalid read of size 4
- From: William Brana <wbrana@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Skipping RVO
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compiler generated copy constructor
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Skipping RVO
- From: navin p <navinp1281@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem building gcc 4.9.2
- From: Jeremy Hall <jeremy.m0jnx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compiler generated copy constructor
- From: navin p <navinp1281@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compiler generated copy constructor
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compiler generated copy constructor
- From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- g++ compiler generated copy constructor
- From: navin p <navinp1281@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem building gcc 4.9.2
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem building gcc 4.9.2
- From: Jeremy Hall <jeremy.m0jnx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: libXcursor + -finline-functions: Invalid read of size 4
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -mno-bmi doesn't work in GCC4.8.2
- From: Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: "Kirill Voronin" <kvoronin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: "Kirill Voronin" <kvoronin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- -mno-bmi doesn't work in GCC4.8.2
- From: hanhwi <jang.hanhwi@xxxxxxxxx>
- In GCC4.8.2, mno-bmi option doesn't work
- From: hanhwi <jang.hanhwi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: C++ name mangling in C
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- C++ name mangling in C
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- libXcursor + -finline-functions: Invalid read of size 4
- From: William Brana <wbrana@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: "Kirill Voronin" <kvoronin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: "Kirill Voronin" <kvoronin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with building gcc 4.9.0 (libstdc++)
- From: "Kirill Voronin" <kvoronin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- line coverage problem with gcov
- From: Ciro Ceissler <ciro.ceissler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- w32api: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.20-gdb.py is not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: 'LDBL_MIN_EXP' undeclared
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.20-gdb.py is not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: undefined symbol: __atomic_store ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: 'LDBL_MIN_EXP' undeclared
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- undefined symbol: __atomic_store ?
- From: 纪明 <jiming@xxxxxxxxx>
- error: 'LDBL_MIN_EXP' undeclared
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Time taken by GCC 4.9.1 to compile
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Time taken by GCC 4.9.1 to compile
- From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Raghunath Lolur <raghunathlolur.subscriptions@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Time taken by GCC 4.9.1 to compile
- From: Raghu L <raghu_lolur@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Time taken by GCC 4.9.1 to compile
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Time taken by GCC 4.9.1 to compile
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Quanyang Liu <lqymgt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to uninstall pre-installed previous version and install new
- From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: gcc 4.6.4 compilation issues
- From: Peter Toth <tothphu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help for the starting of GCC compiler code!
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Help for the starting of GCC compiler code!
- From: Nhựt Tân Nguyễn <ntnguyen.victory@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: wide char support and -fshort-wchar option
- From: Mallikarjun Goudar <mallikarjun.gouda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared libraries + lto ?
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Perf : put all the code in one source file only ?
- From: Alain Meunier <deco33@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: plugin: modify attribute arguments inside plugin
- From: Klemen Jan Enova <klemen.jan.enova@xxxxxxxxx>
- Perf : put all the code in one source file only ?
- From: Alain Meunier <deco33@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9.1 fails to compile in libsanitizer on Fedora 14
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- plugin: modify attribute arguments inside plugin
- From: Klemen Jan Enova <klemen.jan.enova@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: gcc 4.9.1 fails to compile in libsanitizer on Fedora 14
- From: Winston Smith <smith_winston_6079@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- fuse multiple ops into one new op
- From: Cherry Vanc <cherry.vanc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC Plugin: Initialize an Array Global Variable
- From: Stephan Friedl <stephanf01@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC Plugin: Initialize an Array Global Variable
- From: Stephan Friedl <stephanf01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9.1 fails to compile in libsanitizer on Fedora 14
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: wide char support and -fshort-wchar option
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.9.1 fails to compile in libsanitizer on Fedora 14
- From: Winston Smith <smith_winston_6079@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: shared libraries + lto ?
- From: Alain Meunier <deco33@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared libraries + lto ?
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- shared libraries + lto ?
- From: Alain Meunier <deco33@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiler warnings, overflow
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Germán Arias <germanandre@xxxxxx>
- Re: Compiler warnings, overflow
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiler warnings, overflow
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Compiler warnings, overflow
- From: Ricardo Telichevesky <ricardo@xxxxxxxx>
- wide char support and -fshort-wchar option
- From: Mallikarjun Goudar <mallikarjun.gouda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARM cortex-m0] sync built-in functions for atomic memory access
- From: Mallikarjun Goudar <mallikarjun.gouda@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [ARM cortex-m0] sync built-in functions for atomic memory access
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- [ARM cortex-m0] sync built-in functions for atomic memory access
- From: Mallikarjun Goudar <mallikarjun.gouda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Gfortran issue
- From: Jerome Huck <jeromehuck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Germán Arias <germanandre@xxxxxx>
- Re: Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How do I produce (or find) the model or ideal test results for posting?
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How do I produce (or find) the model or ideal test results for posting?
- From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
- How do I produce (or find) the model or ideal test results for posting?
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- lto + pgo + shared libraries : explanation ?
- From: Alain Meunier <deco33@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning for incompatible functions declared 'extern "C"'?
- From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Germán Arias <germanandre@xxxxxx>
- Re: Warning for incompatible functions declared 'extern "C"'?
- From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning for incompatible functions declared 'extern "C"'?
- From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Need help with new frontend development
- From: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Problem to compile gcc 4.9.1
- From: Germán Arias <germanandre@xxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning for incompatible functions declared 'extern "C"'?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Warning for incompatible functions declared 'extern "C"'?
- From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcov problem with shared libs and autotools
- From: Julian Faber <blackbaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pro*c compilation problem in linux
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Pro*c compilation problem in linux
- From: siraj.accet@xxxxxxxxx
- GCC Build error on MAC OS X
- From: abhilash bhandari <abhilash_bhandari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.9 Very slow
- From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with embedded code linking
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with embedded code linking
- From: Niklas Gürtler <profclonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with embedded code linking
- From: Grzesiek Gajoch <gajoch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with embedded code linking
- From: Niklas Gürtler <profclonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Silent stack-heap collision under GNU/Linux
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with embedded code linking
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help with embedded code linking
- From: Grzesiek Gajoch <gajoch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- question
- From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Silent stack-heap collision under GNU/Linux
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Silent stack-heap collision under GNU/Linux
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Silent stack-heap collision under GNU/Linux
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.9 data alignment change, i386 & x86-64
- From: Jordan Justen <jljusten@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Anders Montonen <Anders.Montonen@xxxxxx>
- Re: Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Anders Montonen <Anders.Montonen@xxxxxx>
- Re: Problem building GCC 4.9.1 on x86_64
- From: Raghu L <raghu_lolur@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem building GCC 4.9.1 on x86_64
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Documentation of __sync builtins unclear on external function callback behavior
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem building GCC 4.9.1 on x86_64
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Documentation of __sync builtins unclear on external function callback behavior
- From: Johan Tibell <johan.tibell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "Unknown symbol TOC. (err 0)" on little endian power 8, any solution for it?
- From: Tian Zhan <tzhan.subscribe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: a linker error
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- "Unknown symbol TOC. (err 0)" on little endian power 8, any solution for it?
- From: Tian Zhan <tzhan.subscribe@xxxxxxxxx>
- a linker error
- From: 杰南 <zeng4015@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: a silly question
- From: Yiming CHU <zy14840@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to write GCC plugin for avr-gcc
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC-4.7.0 with Go support
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC-4.7.0 with Go support
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC-4.7.0 with Go support
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Error building mips-sde-elf crosscompiler
- From: Anders Montonen <Anders.Montonen@xxxxxx>
- Re: a silly question
- From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
- a silly question
- From: Yiming CHU <zy14840@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to write GCC plugin for avr-gcc
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC-4.7.0 with Go support
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dumping dynamic symbol information at runtime
- From: "Philip Taffet" <ptaffet@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC-4.7.0 with Go support
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposal N2660 in GCC 4.3?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Proposal N2660 in GCC 4.3?
- From: jvos junk <jvosjunk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: c++11 and packed structures, bitwise operation with -Wconversion
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: c++11 and packed structures, bitwise operation with -Wconversion
- From: Zygmunt Ptak <zygmuntptak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc possible bug...
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc possible bug...
- From: Scott Enyart <scottenyart@xxxxxx>
- Re: c++11 and packed structures, bitwise operation with -Wconversion
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- libgomp tests failing on 4.8.3, 4.9.0
- From: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@xxxxxxxxx>
- c++11 and packed structures, bitwise operation with -Wconversion
- From: Zygmunt Ptak <zygmuntptak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Power consumption ARM vs. x86 (was Re: Creating a cross compiler from ARM to x86)
- From: Stefan Ruppert <sr@xxxxxxxxx>
- some help with avr-gcc ssa tree
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: A A <wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: Alec Teal <a.teal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: Alec Teal <a.teal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Why error "variable previously declared ‘static’ redeclared ‘extern’"?
- From: A A <wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: support branch predication for vectors ( was: casting "extended vectors"
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- support branch predication for vectors ( was: casting "extended vectors"
- From: Vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente@xxxxxxx>
- Re: casting "extended vectors"
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: casting "extended vectors"
- From: Vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente@xxxxxxx>
- Re: casting "extended vectors"
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating a cross compiler from ARM to x86
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating a cross compiler from ARM to x86
- From: Jason Smith <jason.tr.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating a cross compiler from ARM to x86
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Creating a cross compiler from ARM to x86
- From: Jason Smith <jason.tr.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
- casting "extended vectors"
- From: Vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente@xxxxxxx>
- Re: www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs/#nonbugs_c (with ++ / --)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs/#nonbugs_c (with ++ / --)
- From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: legitimize_pic_address
- From: Rajat Singh <rajat.000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs/#nonbugs_c (with ++ / --)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Ragnar Rüütel <ragnar.ruutel@xxxxxxxxx>
- www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs/#nonbugs_c (with ++ / --)
- From: Patrick Serru <patrik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Ragnar Rüütel <ragnar.ruutel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Ragnar Rüütel <ragnar.ruutel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Ragnar Rüütel <ragnar.ruutel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- unable to build gcc 4.9.0 for i686-elf target with posix threads
- From: Ragnar Rüütel <ragnar.ruutel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libjava compiles for wrong architecture
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: libjava compiles for wrong architecture
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- libjava compiles for wrong architecture
- From: Nulik Nol <nuliknol@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need help in understanding performance gains.
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Need help in understanding performance gains.
- From: vijay nag <vijunag@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: can not compute suffix error
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- can not compute suffix error
- From: Nulik Nol <nuliknol@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with Install
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with Install
- From: Mark Nitz <marknitz@xxxxxxxxx>
- legitimize_pic_address
- From: Rajat Singh <rajat.000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need help in changing the register value for function value return
- From: Kavitha Manjunath <kavitha.manjunath@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: gfortran for windows creating 32bit executables
- From: David Gressett <DGressett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran for windows creating 32bit executables
- From: LMH <lmh_users-groups@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran for windows creating 32bit executables
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- gfortran for windows creating 32bit executables
- From: Steve Verdier <Steve.Verdier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need help in changing the register value for function value return
- From: Kavitha Manjunath <kavitha.manjunath@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Need help in changing the register value for function value return
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Need help in changing the register value for function value return
- From: Kavitha Manjunath <kavitha.manjunath@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Optimizations with avr-gcc
- From: Niklas Gürtler <profclonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Optimizations with avr-gcc
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is it safe to generate profiles from multiple concurrent processes?
- From: Vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is it safe to generate profiles from multiple concurrent processes?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is it safe to generate profiles from multiple concurrent processes?
- From: Arbol One <arbolone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc trunk build failure in winnt.c
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- gcc trunk build failure in winnt.c
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: is it safe to generate profiles from multiple concurrent processes?
- From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- is it safe to generate profiles from multiple concurrent processes?
- From: Vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error building GCC 4.8.2
- From: Yunqiang Su <wzssyqa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Error building GCC 4.8.2
- From: Ce Qi <qiceforuni@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fdump-passes not working with gcc-4.8.2
- From: Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield@xxxxxxx>
- Re: fdump-passes not working with gcc-4.8.2
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- fdump-passes not working with gcc-4.8.2
- From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Why are the optimization settings not what the docs say they should be
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM options
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM options
- From: Mark Vojta <mark_vojta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Why are the optimization settings not what the docs say they should be
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC plugin: copying function's arguments
- From: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about gcc vendor string
- From: hitmoon <zhaoxiaoqiang007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about gcc vendor string
- From: hitmoon <zhaoxiaoqiang007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about gcc vendor string
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM options
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about gcc vendor string
- From: hitmoon <zhaoxiaoqiang007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about gcc vendor string
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- about gcc vendor string
- From: hitmoon <zhaoxiaoqiang007@xxxxxxxxx>
- ARM options
- From: Mark Vojta <mark_vojta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to have gcov correctly report unused functions as not executed
- From: "Schlottke, Michael" <m.schlottke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are the optimization settings not what the docs say they should be
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why are the optimization settings not what the docs say they should be
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: -O optimization
- From: "MASUD, SADIA Infotech" <SADIA.MASUD@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: -m32 option failure
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- GCC plugin: copying function's arguments
- From: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Failure while installing gcc
- From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agarwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
- From: Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
- From: Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Failure while installing gcc
- From: Jihene Abdennadher <jihene.abdennadher@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: -m32 option failure
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- RE: -m32 option failure
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- RE: -m32 option failure
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: -m32 option failure
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -m32 option failure
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- -m32 option failure
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Common simd instructions and the gcc vector extensions
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Common simd instructions and the gcc vector extensions
- From: Hendrik Siedelmann <hendrik.siedelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: /jd <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Gcc plugin for modification of source code ?
- From: Mohsin Khan <mohsin1510@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Configuring GCC 4.8.1, Unable to find a usable ISL
- From: Ivan Stalev <idstalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Common simd instructions and the gcc vector extensions
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- Common simd instructions and the gcc vector extensions
- From: Hendrik Siedelmann <hendrik.siedelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Function return register for m68k - Make D7 default instead of D0
- From: Kavitha Manjunath <kavitha.manjunath@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Evaluate 16-bit signed value 0x8000 after left shift by 2
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Evaluate 16-bit signed value 0x8000 after left shift by 2
- From: Åke Forslund <aforslund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Evaluate 16-bit signed value 0x8000 after left shift by 2
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Nicholas Clifton <nickc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Evaluate 16-bit signed value 0x8000 after left shift by 2
- From: Åke Forslund <aforslund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Evaluate 16-bit signed value 0x8000 after left shift by 2
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared_ptr::operator-> does not fail for nullptr
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building gcc-4.8.3 on ppc64
- From: Jeff Preshing <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared_ptr::operator-> does not fail for nullptr
- From: Christoph Mathys <eraserix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linker scripts
- From: rkager <reinhard.kager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linker scripts
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linker scripts
- From: rkager <reinhard.kager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC ignores function attributes
- From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
- From: Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared_ptr::operator-> does not fail for nullptr
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shared_ptr::operator-> does not fail for nullptr
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- shared_ptr::operator-> does not fail for nullptr
- From: Christoph Mathys <eraserix@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ 4.8.2: help on vector
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ 4.8.2: help on vector
- From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- g++ 4.8.2: help on vector
- From: Francis ANDRE <francis.andre.kampbell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Function return value register
- From: Rajat Singh <rajat.000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Discrepency between compiler and docs for optimzation flags
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fileno not visible when -std=c++11 is used
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fileno not visible when -std=c++11 is used
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building gcc-4.8.3 on ppc64
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- fileno not visible when -std=c++11 is used
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- [RX] : Wrong alignment of falign-labels=n
- From: Sandeep Kumar Singh <Sandeep.Singh2@xxxxxxxx>
- Building gcc-4.8.3 on ppc64
- From: Jeff Preshing <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- -mips16 compilation issue
- From: Anoop <anoopmannil@xxxxxxxxx>
- [lto] trying to link with -flto makes troubles
- From: Łukasz Tasz <lukasz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.9.0 installation in fedora 20
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.9.0 installation in fedora 20
- From: "er.atulsingh10@xxxxxxxxx" <er.atulsingh10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ optimization issue / useless instructions for stack access
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- openCL issue
- From: 汪蔚 <wangwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ optimization issue / useless instructions for stack access
- From: Alec Teal <a.teal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: requisites for soft-fp support for a new target
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible 4.8.2 runtime library bug for sscanf
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Possible 4.8.2 runtime library bug for sscanf
- From: "Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Installing GCC 4.9.0 breaks GCC 4.8.2 when using -static-libstdc++
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: long int / int assignment warnings
- From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
- Re: long int / int assignment warnings
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- long int / int assignment warnings
- From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
- Re: Installing GCC 4.9.0 breaks GCC 4.8.2 when using -static-libstdc++
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ 4.8.2: mangled symbol not demangled by c++filt
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- g++ 4.8.2: mangled symbol not demangled by c++filt
- From: Francis ANDRE <francis.andre.kampbell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Installing GCC 4.9.0 breaks GCC 4.8.2 when using -static-libstdc++
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux color question
- From: Errigour <eric_justin_allan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux color question
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux color question
- From: Errigour <eric_justin_allan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux color question
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linux color question
- From: Errigour <eric_justin_allan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Installing GCC 4.9.0 breaks GCC 4.8.2 when using -static-libstdc++
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Installing GCC 4.9.0 breaks GCC 4.8.2 when using -static-libstdc++
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC Compiler/Linker issue (/gnu//binutils-2.23/bfd/linker.c line 2254 in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols)
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC Compiler/Linker issue (/gnu//binutils-2.23/bfd/linker.c line 2254 in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols)
- From: "Vijaya Saradhi. D" <saradhi.d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: "Regan, Brian (EPC COE)" <brian.regan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: "Regan, Brian (EPC COE)" <brian.regan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: "Regan, Brian (EPC COE)" <brian.regan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
- From: "Regan, Brian (EPC COE)" <brian.regan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparc cross-toolchain and libiconv-2.dll
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sparc cross-toolchain and libiconv-2.dll
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ optimization issue / useless instructions for stack access
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to accumulate tokens in #define'd ident ?
- From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to accumulate tokens in #define'd ident ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC refusing to inline a trivial function inside a cilk spawned function
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC refusing to inline a trivial function inside a cilk spawned function
- From: Florent Hivert <Florent.Hivert@xxxxxx>
- Is there something like extern "CPP" ?
- From: "de Brebisson, Cyrille (Calculator Division)" <cyrille@xxxxxx>
- Re: structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
- From: Sivaprasad <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to accumulate tokens in #define'd ident ?
- From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OpenACC 2.0
- From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- OpenACC 2.0
- From: Mark Farnell <mark.farnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC options fo building GLIBC
- From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: building an old glibc
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: gcc trunk 4.10.0 [r210743] powerpc build failure
- From: "rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc trunk 4.10.0 [r210743] powerpc build failure
- From: "rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Development]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]