Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
From: Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:21:48 +0200
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
In-reply-to: <CAFa9FQv-3Ox5mv=-v+P2sXaH+Y9Q1Q=0E4mCwVpJN+zLt45rJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 18 June 2014 22:02, Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkovsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I will investigate more and report it as a bug, because it sure looks like one.

Just for the reference – I submitted this regression as bug #61556

References:
- Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
  - From: Lukas Jirkovsky
- Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
  - From: Lukas Jirkovsky

Prev by Date: Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
Next by Date: Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
Previous by thread: Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
Next by thread: Re: Possible C++11 regression: member of literal type breaks constexpr
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux