On 2014-10-07 14:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Provide an out-of-class definition.
I've defined other functions (operator>> and operator<<) outside the
class, but others are tiny, easily inlinable functions for which it
seems silly to do so.
> Please read
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
> more carefully, all the way to the end of that section. Also try
> reading the http://www.stroustrup.com/bs_faq2.html#in-class page it
> links to.
I have read both, as well as
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Static-Definitions.html
The static variables *are* defined (not just declared) - inside the
class body. The issue was that I was passing them by reference to
function xorshift_engine::shift, which has been fixed.
But anyway...
On 2014-10-07 14:25, Andrew Haley wrote:
But really, we are well outside the scope of gcc-help now.
Agreed.
