Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
From: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:46:52 +0530
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH6eHdT5J3AWGBd25iwFKyRntbgqbWoOLKFAszJnzvkxiYr8ag@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the clarification.

Raja Gopal
smrajagopal [at] gmail [dot] com

References:
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Prev by Date: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Next by Date: Finding positions of the instructions
Previous by thread: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Next by thread: Finding positions of the instructions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux