> > For the "config.guess" file, yes it was supposed to be there because in w32api-3.17 this file was present. > > In w32api-4.0.3.1, it is absent. > > This file is useful to guess my platform: > > $ ./config.guess > > i686-pc-linux-gnu > > So, instead of calling this config.guess script, I can replace it by the "i686-pc-linux-gnu" string. > > It's used by configure to guess you platform if you don't tell it, so > using the script to tell configure is just pointless, you're setting > the value to what will be guessed anyway. > > Don't use the --build option, and configure will guess it for you (by > calling build.aux/config,guess ... apparently you didn't look very > hard for the file). > > > It is just strange that this file is missing. > > It's just moved. > > Stop using --build=`config.guess` because it's pointless, and the > problem goes away. > > > For the "--disable-nls" option it is because I don't need Native Language Support for this compiler. > > This option was available for w32api-3.17 but seems to be absent from the w32api-4.0.3.1 release. > > But w32api is not the compiler. If you don't want NLS in the compiler, > pass --disable-nls to the compiler, you don't need to pass it to other > things. So you can just stop using that option too. > > > Yes, I am aware that this is a problem of w32api (which is part of the mingw project). > > This mailing-list is for discussions about gcc. > > On the mailing-list of mingw, I have already asked, and there is a lack of responses so I try here. > > I am using gcc-4.9.1 to build my cross-compiler as you can see above, so we can say that this discussion is not completely out of the mailing-list focus. > > Just because you use GCC to compile some code doesn't make this list > the right place to ask about that code. > > > > I am wondering why my C compiler cannot create executables. > > I have compiled it with these options: > > $ ../gcc-4.9.1/configure --prefix=/usr --target=i686-pc-mingw32 --disable-shared --enable-languages=c --disable-nls > > Look in the config.log file, it will show why it failed. > > > I have always used these options for building my cross-compiler. > > Today, I try with a new version of gcc and it is a failure. > > Because you used a different version of w32api, it has nothing to do > with the new GCC. > > > Instead of downgrading, I would like to understand better why it does not work with the latest gcc, binutils, w32api and mingwrt. > > If anyone has an idea about that, please tell me. > > The w32api package changed, but that's nothing to do with GCC. Yes, you have totally right: That's nothing to do with gcc. In fact, that was a problem occurring on the last w32api-4.0.3.1 tarball. If I keep the old one (w32api-3.17), it works. So, no problem to build a cross-compiler using: - binutils-2.24.51 - gcc-4.9.1 - mingwrt-3.20.2 - w32api-3.17 Thanks for the support (and sorry for the wrong mailing-list).