Re: Documentation of __sync builtins unclear on external function callback behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/07/14 23:01, Johan Tibell wrote:
> The documentation of the __sync atomic builtins [1] state that
> 
>> Not all operations are supported by all target processors. If a
>> particular operation cannot be implemented on the target processor,
>> a warning is generated and a call an external function is
>> generated. The external function carries the same name as the
>> built-in version, with an additional suffix ‘_n’ where n is the
>> size of the data type.
> 
> I initial read this as a call to some function *defined by GCC* is
> being emitted, but I now realize that this can be read as "the caller
> is supposed to have defined such a fallback function". Which reading
> is correct?

The latter.  Hwever, in some cases in may not even be possible: the
hardware may be incapable of doing it.

> I have some code that fails to compile on i386 with the error
> 
>     /usr/home/ghc-builder/work/builder/tempbuild/build/libraries/ghc-prim/dist-install/build/libHSghc-prim-0.3.1.0-ghc7.9.20140716.so:
> undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_8'
> 
> so I guess that means that GCC is not defining these external fallback
> functions?

My guess is that you're building for an x86 that can't do it.
-march=i586 ought to work.  i386 won't.

Andrew.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux