GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: building an old glibc
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• building an old glibc
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dealing with warnings & pragma GCC diagnostic in LTO-enabled builds
  • From: Emmanuel Blot <eblot.ml@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dealing with warnings & pragma GCC diagnostic in LTO-enabled builds
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• vec.h error: "more than one instance of function matches the argument list"
  • From: Gil Rutter <go.rutter@xxxxxxxxx>
• Dealing with warnings & pragma GCC diagnostic in LTO-enabled builds
  • From: Emmanuel Blot <eblot.ml@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC & libs with -falign-function=512 -g
  • From: DavidTroendle <dtroendle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dictating location/order of gcc plugin
  • From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
• Dictating location/order of gcc plugin
  • From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc optimizations in 4.9.0 for the less popular archs(alpha, ia64)
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc optimizations in 4.9.0 for the less popular archs(alpha, ia64)
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: requisites for soft-fp support for a new target
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Building cross m68k-elf
  • From: Ken Mandelberg <km@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Building cross m68k-elf
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Building cross m68k-elf
  • From: Ken Mandelberg <km@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Building cross m68k-elf
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Trouble Building cross m68k-elf
  • From: Ken Mandelberg <km@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
  • From: Sivaprasad <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Frontend documentation
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• structure size and structure element offset calculation issue
  • From: Sivaprasad <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ambiguity in "and" expression in Machine Descriptions
  • From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How can i use 'freorder-functions'?
  • From: "Jungsoo Son" <jungsoo.son@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc inline assembly for the not so popular chips(ia64, alpha, powerpc))
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc inline assembly for the not so popular chips(ia64, alpha, powerpc))
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Frontend documentation
  • From: Paulo Matos <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lttng-dev] compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.9.0 for cygwin-cross-alpha,cygwin-cross-ia64
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc 4.9.0 for cygwin-cross-alpha,cygwin-cross-ia64
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C macro expansion tracking
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• C macro expansion tracking
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: requisites for soft-fp support for a new target
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Dictating location/order of gcc plugin
  • From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Frontend documentation
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC refusing to inline a trivial function inside a cilk spawned function
  • From: Florent Hivert <Florent.Hivert@xxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: "Christoph K." <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: requisites for soft-fp support for a new target
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• requisites for soft-fp support for a new target
  • From: Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi <sheheryar.zahoor.qazi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: link time optimization issue
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• link time optimization issue
  • From: Henrik Juul Pedersen <hjp@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Frontend documentation
  • From: Paulo Matos <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Frontend documentation
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak hidden undefined symbol loses hidden visiblity with GCC 4.7.2
  • From: Henrik Wallin <henrikwallin72@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak hidden undefined symbol loses hidden visiblity with GCC 4.7.2
  • From: Martin Ünsal <martinunsal@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simple question related to modifying a GCC pass
  • From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
• Frontend documentation
  • From: Paulo Matos <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ running async???
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU attributes with C++11 syntax
  • From: ArbolOne <ArbolOne@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU attributes with C++11 syntax
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU attributes with C++11 syntax
  • From: ArbolOne <ArbolOne@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling binaries for MIC native and offload modes with gcc-4.9
  • From: Mark Farnell <mark.farnell@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: "Christoph K." <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to build gcc using the translation project languages?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to build gcc using the translation project languages?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to build gcc using the translation project languages?
  • From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak hidden undefined symbol loses hidden visiblity with GCC 4.7.2
  • From: Henrik Wallin <henrikwallin72@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling binaries for MIC native and offload modes with gcc-4.9
  • From: Stephan Walter <stephan.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating GCC/libstdc++ toolchain to create most compatible binaries
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating GCC/libstdc++ toolchain to create most compatible binaries
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Creating GCC/libstdc++ toolchain to create most compatible binaries
  • From: Jonas Müller <jonasmllr4@xxxxxxxxx>
• Simple question related to modifying a GCC pass
  • From: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: wiki account creation page broken
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• wiki account creation page broken
  • From: Brad Finney <Brad.Finney@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• question to OMP_DISPLAY_ENV
  • From: Siegmar Gross <Siegmar.Gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with fprintf and OpenMP
  • From: Siegmar Gross <Siegmar.Gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Ambiguity in "and" expression in Machine Descriptions
  • From: Aniket Deole <aniket.deole@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling for --target=arm-epoc-pe
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU attributes with C++11 syntax
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• GNU attributes with C++11 syntax
  • From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• asm and functions with __attribute__((naked))
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling binaries for MIC native and offload modes with gcc-4.9
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling binaries for MIC native and offload modes with gcc-4.9
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• compiling binaries for MIC native and offload modes with gcc-4.9
  • From: Mark Farnell <mark.farnell@xxxxxxxxx>
• Weak hidden undefined symbol loses hidden visiblity with GCC 4.7.2
  • From: Martin Ünsal <martinunsal@xxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc 4.9.0 cross compiler for msp430 fails - cannot compute suffix of object files
  • From: "Christoph K." <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Toy examples of pipeline descriptions with GCC's automata
  • From: Paulo Matos <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toy examples of pipeline descriptions with GCC's automata
  • From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gfortran - mpif.h reading problem
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Gfortran - mpif.h reading problem
  • From: venkataraman thiagarajan <vtrajan22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with __start_SECNAME symbol generated by GNU linker
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with __start_SECNAME symbol generated by GNU linker
  • From: Martin Ünsal <martinunsal@xxxxxxxxx>
• Toy examples of pipeline descriptions with GCC's automata
  • From: Paulo Matos <paulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wvarargs does not warn for member functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ and objective-c
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wvarargs does not warn for member functions
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ and objective-c
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++ and objective-c
  • From: Steven Boyls <sboyls@xxxxxx>
• -Wvarargs does not warn for member functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ running async???
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Order of initialization of global/static variables
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ running async???
  • From: "moze" <moze@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Order of initialization of global/static variables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Order of initialization of global/static variables
  • From: Yaron Dayagi <yarondayagi@xxxxxxxxx>
• g++ running async???
  • From: "moze" <moze@xxxxxxx>
• (gcc-ar/ranlib) Suppress "has no symbols" warning?
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Information on atomics in the gnu extensions: is a dereference atomic?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC option "-melf64ppc" removed since 4.6, any alternative options?
  • From: segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: gcc 4.9.0 and cilkplus high kernel cpu usage?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.9.0 and cilkplus high kernel cpu usage?
  • From: Stefan Ruppert <sr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Yuriy Chernyshov <georgthegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Best Gcc for IA64?
  • From: Seima Rao <seimarao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Yuriy Chernyshov <georgthegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compilation takes too long time
  • From: Yuriy Chernyshov <georgthegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libtool problems while building gcc
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: why gcc-4.9.0 create larger files on 32bits system than 64btis.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• why gcc-4.9.0 create larger files on 32bits system than 64btis.
  • From: xinglp <xinglp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structures with the same name are messed up
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structures with the same name are messed up
  • From: Gyorgy Kovesdi <kgy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to merge OpenACC and OpenMP 4.0 in GCC 4.9
  • From: Paolo Leoni <ulixes84@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: structures with the same name are messed up
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• structures with the same name are messed up
  • From: Gyorgy Kovesdi <kgy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libtool problems while building gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Local Reg Vars question
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mips64 compiler complains: linking PIC files with non-PIC files
  • From: jestin james <james.jestin@xxxxxxxxx>
• mips64 compiler complains: linking PIC files with non-PIC files
  • From: jestin james <james.jestin@xxxxxxxxx>
• libtool problems while building gcc
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with GCC 4.9.0, Wextra, c++1y, and post-preprocessed linux header files
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with GCC 4.9.0, Wextra, c++1y, and post-preprocessed linux header files
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with GCC 4.9.0, Wextra, c++1y, and post-preprocessed linux header files
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with GCC 4.9.0, Wextra, c++1y, and post-preprocessed linux header files
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with GCC 4.9.0, Wextra, c++1y, and post-preprocessed linux header files
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need some help with a possible bug
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need some help with a possible bug
  • From: George R Goffe <grgoffe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need some help with a possible bug
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc set default option OSX
  • From: Haneef Mubarak <haneef503@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC option "-melf64ppc" removed since 4.6, any alternative options?
  • From: 天詹 <tzhan.subscribe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• helping the compiler with asserts-hints to optimize
  • From: Agustin Perez Paladini <agudpp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU Objective-C doesn't exists
  • From: Adrien Nader <adrien@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU Objective-C doesn't exists
  • From: Solal <solal.rastier@xxxxxx>
• Re: GNU Objective-C doesn't exists
  • From: Solal <solal.rastier@xxxxxx>
• gcc appears to ignore -fno-short-enums when used with LTO
  • From: Bobby Moretti <bobmoretti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU Objective-C doesn't exists
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GNU Objective-C doesn't exists
  • From: Solal <solal.rastier@xxxxxx>
• Re: Issue while building GCC-4.6.1 on rhel 6.4
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue while building GCC-4.6.1 on rhel 6.4
  • From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue while building GCC-4.6.1 on rhel 6.4
  • From: Sandeep Nadkarni <snadkarni@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue while building GCC-4.6.1 on rhel 6.4
  • From: Sandeep <sandeep.nadkarni@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building GCC
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building GCC
  • From: Jay <jay.krell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building GCC
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Error building GCC
  • From: Vladimír Fuka <vladimir.fuka@xxxxxxxxx>
• gprof out of memory
  • From: MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrapping fails with lto
  • From: "Henning Thedens" <hete2@xxxxxx>
• Using GCC to convert markup to C++
  • From: Akos Vandra <axos88@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc/arm and implementing libraries by hand
  • From: Jędrzej Dudkiewicz <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Bug linking using ld 2.19?
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: building gcc to support -mx32
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking against particular libssl
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking against particular libssl
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc to support -mx32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking against particular libssl
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Linking against particular libssl
  • From: Sahib Jakhar <sahib.jakhar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: building gcc to support -mx32
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: building gcc to support -mx32
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC 4.9 RC with in-tree binutils
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC 4.9 RC with in-tree binutils
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC 4.9 RC with in-tree binutils
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC 4.9 RC with in-tree binutils
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pb on gcc : no warning on information lost.
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pb on gcc : no warning on information lost.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc with gmp source is failing with "Can't find gmp headers" (Centos 6.5)
  • From: Dave Gittins <dave.gittins@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -all_load for non-OSX?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address sanitizer use a lot of memory
  • From: ownssh <ownsshaim@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Address sanitizer use a lot of memory
  • From: ownssh <ownsshaim@xxxxxxx>
• -all_load for non-OSX?
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Address sanitizer use a lot of memory
  • From: ownssh <ownsshaim@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Having great difficulty using wstring_convert<> in mingw-builds x64-4.8.1-win32-seh-rev5
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Having great difficulty using wstring_convert<> in mingw-builds x64-4.8.1-win32-seh-rev5
  • From: "Jack PC TLC Ltd" <sharmanjf@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC m68k pc-relative
  • From: "Serge Wojtowski" <swojtowski@xxxxxxx>
• Re: C99 struct initialiser with embedded self assignment
  • From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Hint for function which registers to save
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Hint for function which registers to save
  • From: Dima Sorkin <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• link errors with -flto and -Wl,-soname,f.o
  • From: Jay Foad <jay.foad@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C99 struct initialiser with embedded self assignment
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc to support -mx32
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• C99 struct initialiser with embedded self assignment
  • From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Expected Behavior in Mixing -std=c++0x and default std?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: variables order(arrange)
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Expected Behavior in Mixing -std=c++0x and default std?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: variables order(arrange)
  • From: Man Glory <glory_man@xxxxxx>
• Expected Behavior in Mixing -std=c++0x and default std?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: documentation of gcc to learn more about the architecture and implementation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble with automatic symbol export/import on Cygwin64
  • From: Jean-Pierre Flori <jpflori@xxxxxxxxx>
• Old GCC has no -fprofile-dir -- workarounds?
  • From: Gabor Kozar <kozargabor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Trouble with automatic symbol export/import on Cygwin64
  • From: Jean-Pierre Flori <jpflori@xxxxxxxxx>
• documentation of gcc to learn more about the architecture and implementation
  • From: jestin james <james.jestin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC LTO fails static linking while builtins are enabled
  • From: Grigoriy Kraynov <grigoriy.kraynov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: casting variadic function pointer to non-variadic function pointer
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• casting variadic function pointer to non-variadic function pointer
  • From: Pavel Andrejs <pavel.andrejs@xxxxxxxxx>
• best document to learn gcc design and architecture?
  • From: jestin james <james.jestin@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to prevent pre-inlcude of stdc-predef.h
  • From: Frank Dordowsky <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining OS
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: variables order(arrange)
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• variables order(arrange)
  • From: Man Glory <glory_man@xxxxxx>
• Getting a full signature of template instantiation
  • From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gfortran : fortran 90 not supported
  • From: Jesús Garicano Mena <jesus.garicano.mena@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gfortran : fortran 90 not supported
  • From: Jesús Garicano Mena <jesus.garicano.mena@xxxxxxxxx>
• What is the right way to pass optimization flags when building (cross) GCC?
  • From: Sergio <year1943@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Playing with devirtualization in g++4.9
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with 552 spam score exceeded threshold
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help with 552 spam score exceeded threshold
  • From: Martin Liška <mliska@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Playing with devirtualization in g++4.9
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Playing with devirtualization in g++4.9
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Playing with devirtualization in g++4.9
  • From: Robert Matusewicz <matekm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc for coldfire (m68k variant)
  • From: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@xxxxxx>
• Preventing that a function inlines other functions
  • From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining OS
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Determining OS
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Spaces in macro expansion in a #include?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Spaces in macro expansion in a #include?
  • From: "xuinkrbin." <gcc.20.xuinkrbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Spaces in macro expansion in a #include?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Spaces in macro expansion in a #include?
  • From: "xuinkrbin." <gcc.20.xuinkrbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Bdot <bertramf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Bdot <bertramf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Recursive template instantiation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Recursive template instantiation
  • From: Yury Usishchev <jolfzverb@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared gmp (and friends)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared gmp (and friends)
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared gmp (and friends)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Shared gmp (and friends)
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: return value aliasing ?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• return value aliasing ?
  • From: Joachim Schöberl <joachim.schoeberl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Xinrong Fu <fxinrong@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: loody <miloody@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization problem: ptr not kept in register
  • From: "Peter A. Felvegi" <petschy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ assembler with cygwin
  • From: "jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx" <jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ assembler with cygwin
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• compile lttng get gcc compile error
  • From: loody <miloody@xxxxxxxxx>
• g++ assembler with cygwin
  • From: "jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx" <jfrm.maurel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using gcc on an embedded system, with its own prefix and lib dirs.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization problem: ptr not kept in register
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using gcc on an embedded system, with its own prefix and lib dirs.
  • From: Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new to gcc
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: new to gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new to gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• new to gcc
  • From: "albert.kasenter" <albert.kasenter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization problem: ptr not kept in register
  • From: "Peter A. Felvegi" <petschy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization problem: ptr not kept in register
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• optimization problem: ptr not kept in register
  • From: "Peter A. Felvegi" <petschy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why is the performance of 32bit program worse than 64bit program running on the same 64bit system, They are compiled from same source. Which gcc option can fix it?
  • From: Xinrong Fu <fxinrong@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Dynamic loading and unloading of functions in gcc-4.
  • From: "adi.bhandari" <adi.bhandari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC LTO fails static linking while builtins are enabled
  • From: Grigoriy Kraynov <grigoriy.kraynov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: "Kilian, Jens" <Jens.KILIAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Using gcc on an embedded system, with its own prefix and lib dirs.
  • From: Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: "Harry Prevor" <habs@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Harry Prevor <habs@xxxxxxx>
• bootstrap-ubsan compilation fails due to lto-plugin
  • From: Paulo Matos <paulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ARM7-M intrinsics?
  • From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: "Kilian, Jens" <Jens.KILIAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  • From: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: ARM GCC pessimizer
  • From: Paulo Matos <paulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help me
  • From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL error for member access
  • From: blackoil <tdz_canton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help me
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: help me
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• ARM GCC pessimizer
  • From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• help me
  • From: Ali Abdul Ghani <blade.vp2020@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Hidouri Soufien <hidourisoufien@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Soufien <hidouri1920@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Hidouri Soufien <hidourisoufien@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc 4.6.1 using a later version
  • From: "Guillaume Quere" <gquere@xxxxxx>
• Re: Raspberry Pi cross compiler
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Testing 31 bit Gcc
  • From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Raspberry Pi cross compiler
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How can I make this code friendly to GCC's optimizer?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• How can I make this code friendly to GCC's optimizer?
  • From: Steven Stewart-Gallus <sstewartgallus00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Google Summer of Code
  • From: Mihai Mandrescu <mihai.mandrescu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble building with included libraries
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• trouble building with included libraries
  • From: Sam Hansen <solid.se7en@xxxxxxxxx>
• Determining if a FUNCTION_DECL node is a C++ template specialization
  • From: Joe Doyle <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Harry Prevor <habs@xxxxxxx>
• Plugin duplicating statements
  • From: Daniel Ptáček <ptacek.daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Harry Prevor <habs@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Harry Prevor <habs@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Harry Prevor <habs@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation errors building gcc on mipsel
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issues installing GCC libraries
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Issues installing GCC libraries
  • From: "Falk, Katerina" <kfalk@xxxxxxxx>
• Dumping x86 cfg using gcc
  • From: Baris Kasikci <bariskasikci@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCOV Loading error.
  • From: AKSHYA CHHABRA <akshya.chhabra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcov support for shared library
  • From: AKSHYA CHHABRA <akshya.chhabra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avr-gcc optimization issue
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Hidouri Soufien <hidourisoufien@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: avr-gcc optimization issue
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc fails to build since texinfo was upgraded to 5.0-1
  • From: Soufien <hidourisoufien@xxxxxxxxx>
• avr-gcc optimization issue
  • From: Henrik Juul Pedersen <hjp@xxxxxxx>
• GCOV Loading error.
  • From: Akshya Chhabra <akshya.chhabra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: logging gcc messages
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RECORD_TYPE with 1 field
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: logging gcc messages
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• logging gcc messages
  • From: Michael Markowsky <mmarkows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• SPARC option -mapp-regs
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ exceptions with many threads and no memory.
  • From: John Steele Scott <toojays@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ exceptions with many threads and no memory.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Target dependence of conditional expression gimplification
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++ exceptions with many threads and no memory.
  • From: John Steele Scott <toojays@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• char*, aliasing and writing efficient code
  • From: "Peter A. Felvegi" <petschy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.2 -Wno-format feat/broken
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpp again
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpp again
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• cpp again
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Weak symbols and inline
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• "LONG_BIT" Error, When cross compiling for Android
  • From: Zachary Powell <zacthespack@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libcpp backtrack lexer
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: decltype
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: decltype
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• decltype
  • From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• libcpp backtrack lexer
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• how to mark macros as deprecated?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Attribute const and inline functions
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gprof output question
  • From: MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gprof output question
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.4.3 build on redhat6.3 - fixedincludes is missing headers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.4.3 build on redhat6.3 - fixedincludes is missing headers
  • From: vkr <venkatakrishnarao.ks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gprof output question
  • From: MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: ronf <ron@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC 4.9: No rule to make target ../build-x89_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libiberty/libiberty.a
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Build 64/32 bit link error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc Build 64/32 bit link error
  • From: Thomas <nkt747@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Marcello Stanisci <stanisci.m@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Marcello Stanisci <stanisci.m@xxxxxxxxx>
• Profiling issues
  • From: MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiler optimizing variables in inline assembly
  • From: Cody Rigney <codyrigney92@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Saul Tamari <stamari@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Saul Tamari <stamari@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Saul Tamari <stamari@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Moving C++ code to a different ELF section
  • From: Saul Tamari <stamari@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question on std :: initializer_list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question on std :: initializer_list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• question on std :: initializer_list
  • From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Marcello Stanisci <stanisci.m@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc] Build fail for 2.95.3 version on a modern system
  • From: Marcello Stanisci <stanisci.m@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] no warning on int conversion overflow in non-c99 mode
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warnings in GCC disappearing if recompiled or small changes made
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] no warning on int conversion overflow in non-c99 mode
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc] no warning on int conversion overflow in non-c99 mode
  • From: A A <wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Warnings in GCC disappearing if recompiled or small changes made
  • From: danz <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc] no warning on int conversion overflow in non-c99 mode
  • From: A A <wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC 4.9: No rule to make target ../build-x89_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libiberty/libiberty.a
  • From: crazed.husk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts?
  • From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts?
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts?
  • From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts?
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ask 4 some help
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.4.3 build on redhat6.3 - fixedincludes is missing headers
  • From: vkr <venkatakrishnarao.ks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: ronf <ron@xxxxxxxx>
• MSP430 in gcc4.9 ... enable interrupts?
  • From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Excluding parts of the instruction set during compilation
  • From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@xxxxxxx>
• Re: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator"" f’
  • From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
• Excluding parts of the instruction set during compilation
  • From: Fabian Oboril <fabian.oboril@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Dead code elimination PROBLEM
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dead code elimination PROBLEM
  • From: chronicle <chassin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dead code elimination PROBLEM
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Dead code elimination PROBLEM
  • From: chronicle <chassin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ...
  • From: Mohsin Khan <mohsin1510@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ...
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help Required on Missing GOTO statements in Gimple/SSA/CFG Pass ...
  • From: Mohsin Khan <mohsin1510@xxxxxxxxx>
• GENERIC build pointer plus expression
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Possible bug in destructor code generation
  • From: Giancarlo Niccolai <gc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Soufien Hidouri <hidourisoufien@xxxxxxxxx>
• GEM Framework help (GCC Hack?)
  • From: Adam Fiksen <fiksen99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ask 4 some help
  • From: zds <zhudongsheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HELP: GAlib
  • From: Anna Szekér <kordely@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HELP: GAlib
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• HELP: GAlib
  • From: Anna Szekér <kordely@xxxxxxxxx>
• building 'independent' gnu toolchain
  • From: krafczyk <krafczyk.matthew@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC Failed: stubs-32.h missing
  • From: ronf <ron@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.1, powerpc, .data.rel.ro.local entry with no corresponding .fixup entry
  • From: Joerg Albert <jal2@xxxxxx>
• RE: HELP: avr-gcov
  • From: "Dhakshinamoorthy, Soundararajan" <Soundararajan.Dhakshinamoorthy@xxxxxxxxx>
• HELP: avr-gcov
  • From: Satya <satya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• foptimize_strlen
  • From: Vikas Salar <vikassalar0507@xxxxxxxxx>
• Windres Documentation?
  • From: Tonyb <tonylindee@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem using windres
  • From: Tonyb <tonylindee@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem using windres
  • From: Tonyb <tonylindee@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-end Closures
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-end Closures
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-end Closures
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-end Closures
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Front-end Closures
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: confirm subscribe to gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx (Jose E. Marchesi)
• Re: confirm unsubscribe from gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx (Jose E. Marchesi)
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: vijay nag <vijunag@xxxxxxxxx>
• arm-eabi-ld -S optoin
  • From: Channagoud <ckadabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: suboptimal asm generated for a simple loop
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• suboptimal asm generated for a simple loop
  • From: Marcin Krotkiewski <marcin.krotkiewski@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: vijay nag <vijunag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detect empty functions
  • From: vijay nag <vijunag@xxxxxxxxx>
• detect empty functions
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with check=all option.
  • From: Patrick Begou <Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What registers are protected by "cc" in a clobberlist when using inline assembly?
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What registers are protected by "cc" in a clobberlist when using inline assembly?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• What registers are protected by "cc" in a clobberlist when using inline assembly?
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MIPS GCC always generates outline memcpy when optimizing for size?
  • From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@xxxxxxxx>
• Git repo lagging behing
  • From: Paulo Matos <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• question
  • From: Graziano Servizi <Graziano.Servizi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.1, powerpc, .data.rel.ro.local entry with no corresponding .fixup entry
  • From: Joerg Albert <jal2@xxxxxx>
• RE: Library functions running in RAM
  • From: Janáček Jiří <jiri.janacek@xxxxxxxx>
• Library functions running in RAM
  • From: Janáček Jiří <jiri.janacek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC and C++11...no friends?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gfortran: trouble creating statically link executable
  • From: ken72cc <ken72cc-a@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC and C++11...no friends?
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC and C++11...no friends?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC and C++11...no friends?
  • From: Kevin Ingwersen <ingwie2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• MIPS GCC always generates outline memcpy when optimizing for size?
  • From: Anders Montonen <Anders.Montonen@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors
  • From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquinlopezmunoz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors
  • From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquinlopezmunoz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gfortran: trouble creating statically link executable
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Gfortran: trouble creating statically link executable
  • From: ken72cc <ken72cc-a@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Behaviour of GCC with flto probably bug
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Behaviour of GCC with flto probably bug
  • From: "Erotavlas_turbo@xxxxxxxxx" <Erotavlas_turbo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ColdFire and Thread-Local Storage
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: potential bug regarding rvalue refs?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: potential bug regarding rvalue refs?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ColdFire and Thread-Local Storage
  • From: "Norbert Lange" <lange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: potential bug regarding rvalue refs?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• potential bug regarding rvalue refs?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ColdFire and Thread-Local Storage
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ColdFire and Thread-Local Storage
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Linking error: "*Output file* uses VFP register arguments, *library *does not"(cross compiler for ARM, Cortex-M3)
  • From: knauf <kaizer.rtk@xxxxxxxxx>
• ColdFire and Thread-Local Storage
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compile error: 'siginfo_t' is not declared using gcc-4.8.2 on RedHat, 6.4
  • From: John Dubchak <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++11 ABI Compatibility for 4.8 and 4.9?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++11 ABI Compatibility for 4.8 and 4.9?
  • From: Lars Hagström <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++11 ABI Compatibility for 4.8 and 4.9?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++11 ABI Compatibility for 4.8 and 4.9?
  • From: Lars Hagström <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does std::chrono now() uses slow syscall?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does std::chrono now() uses slow syscall?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why does std::chrono now() uses slow syscall?
  • From: Keith Erickson <kerickso@xxxxxxxx>
• Adding a global static instance of a class and having the constructor invoked on initialization
  • From: Stephan Friedl <stephanf01@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: Lars Hagström <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?
  • From: pinskia@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any way to output information on compiler-generated temporary variables in gcc?
  • From: Michele Co <mc2zk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• optimization issues in gcc 4,8
  • From: Johan Danielsson <joda@xxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output information on compiler-generated temporary variables in gcc?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output information on compiler-generated temporary variables in gcc?
  • From: Michele Co <mc2zk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to use the KNC Vectorregisters with GCC? Race condition with ICC & KNC?
  • From: Stephan Walter <stephan.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to use the KNC Vectorregisters with GCC? Race condition with ICC & KNC?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to use the KNC Vectorregisters with GCC? Race condition with ICC & KNC?
  • From: Stephan Walter <stephan.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Struct member & __attribute__((aligned)) in public header
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the system include directory?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sponsoring work on GCC
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output information on compiler-generated temporary variables in gcc?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Any way to output information on compiler-generated temporary variables in gcc?
  • From: Michele Co <mc2zk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Sponsoring work on GCC
  • From: Patrick Oppenlander <pattyo.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: default include files only included in main file ?
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• default include files only included in main file ?
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• What's the system include directory?
  • From: parmenides <mobile.parmenides@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make -k check error
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make -k check error
  • From: David Kredba <nheghathivhistha@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make -k check error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• make -k check error
  • From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran installation to my Ubuntu computer
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: structure packing
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: structure packing
  • From: vijay nag <vijunag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran installation to my Ubuntu computer
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gfortran installation to my Ubuntu computer
  • From: "Kilci, Reyhane" <rkilci@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: why does gcc need -fno-trapping-math to generate roundsd instructions?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: building icedtea-7 on ARM
  • From: Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: USER_LABEL_PREFIX appear on internal assembler labels
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Build error try to build GCC 4.2.4 using GCC 4.8.2 on Fedora 20
  • From: Mark Petronic <Mark.Petronic@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build error after successful config on Redhat 6.2 with gcc 4.8.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Build error after successful config on Redhat 6.2 with gcc 4.8.2
  • From: crazed.husk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Build error try to build GCC 4.2.4 using GCC 4.8.2 on Fedora 20
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• USER_LABEL_PREFIX appear on internal assembler labels
  • From: "Benjamin Burtscher" <benjamin.burtscher@xxxxxx>
• RE: Build error try to build GCC 4.2.4 using GCC 4.8.2 on Fedora 20
  • From: Mark Petronic <Mark.Petronic@xxxxxxxxxx>
• why does gcc need -fno-trapping-math to generate roundsd instructions?
  • From: Jay Foad <jay.foad@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building icedtea-7 on ARM
  • From: Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to test uninstalled GCC 4.8 C and Fortran compilers?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to test uninstalled GCC 4.8 C and Fortran compilers?
  • From: Brian Drummond <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to test uninstalled GCC 4.8 C and Fortran compilers?
  • From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Generating Assembly Files Using GCC
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Test suite results what they mean and how to evaluate
  • From: Mark Henwood <mhenwood@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: shall890 <sahallacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Test suite results what they mean and how to evaluate
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Test suite results what they mean and how to evaluate
  • From: Mark Henwood <mhenwood@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: shall890 <sahallacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Any way to output variable names with their size (i.e. int, char and etc.)
  • From: shall890 <sahallacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• -O3 failures with ? vectorization in gcc 4.9
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: building icedtea-7 on ARM
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• building icedtea-7 on ARM
  • From: Grant <emailgrant@xxxxxxxxx>
• -Bsymbolic-functions breaks PMF comparison under ARM
  • From: "Giuseppe D'Angelo" <giuseppe.dangelo@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Generating Assembly Files Using GCC
  • From: rajkrishna <krishnakumar.vengadasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Confused by the annotation in should_replace_address, a mistake ???
  • From: Peter Xu <peter.cose.seu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Generating Assembly Files Using GCC
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Runtime warning: Symbol [vtable] has different size in shared object, consider relinking
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Flexible array member initializers
  • From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
• Runtime warning: Symbol [vtable] has different size in shared object, consider relinking
  • From: Tyler Cardon <tyler.k.cardon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Webkit-gtk 2.2.3 LTO problem
  • From: David Kredba <nheghathivhistha@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Webkit-gtk 2.2.3 LTO problem
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• LTO build of elfutils-0.158 fails
  • From: David Kredba <nheghathivhistha@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: build warning question - gcc 4.4.5
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: build warning question - gcc 4.4.5
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Finding a relevant place for a custom GCC pass
  • From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>