On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 23:05 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote: > You mean always_inline? Well, it has the advantage that it doesn't > force the function to be inlined ;-) Yes, sorry. But what's wrong with forcing inline? :-). We're already well beyond worrying about portability, and into "does it work"-ability. > > If I don't include the header file, then the code silently falls back to > > the system new/delete. > > It shouldn't be hard to check if nm -D yourlib.so contains _Znwm as U, > you can add that to the Makefile. Yes, I was playing with this. Pretty straightforward I agree. > Well, if you control the Makefile, you can actually add -include mynew > on the command line so it can't be forgotten... Unfortunately that's much harder to do in a portable way (GNU/Linux, MacOSX, Windows). I can run the nm check only on Linux and that should be good enough, since almost all the code is the same on all three platforms.
