Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:02:36 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>, "Kilian\, Jens" <Jens.KILIAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gcc-help\@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAKOQZ8zLw77G0Ayb6WiJ_4AuLNqFk3xT5D05_9HHtkFRJ_jtaA@mail.gmail.com> (Ian Lance Taylor's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:59:52 -0700")

* Ian Lance Taylor:

> You neglected to say what machine you were running on.  __main is only
> used on some platforms.  In particular it is not used on GNU/Linux.

Do you know how this behavior of collect2 is controlled?  I would like
to add this to the gccint documentation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Kilian, Jens
- Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Eric Wolf
- Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Prev by Date: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Next by Date: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Previous by thread: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Next by thread: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]