Re: Order of initialization of global/static variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30 April 2014 01:30, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Yaron Dayagi <yarondayagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> In gcc 4.4.6 we had no problem with the order of initialization.
>> In gcc 4.7.2 we do have a problem.
>> A CPP file defined GlobalObj_1 (declared extern in the H file):
>> CMyClass GlobalObj_1.
>> Another CPP file declared GlobalObj_2 (also declared extern in the H
>> file).=  The CPP file used copy constructor:
>> CMyClass GlobalObj_2(GlobalObj_1).
>> In 4.4.6 GlobalObj_1 was initialized first. Now GlobalObj_2 is
>> initialized = first.
>> Is this intentional?
>> How do I revert to old behavior?
>> The problem is that we have many files with many global variables (const).
>
> The C++ language does not define the order in which global variables
> in different files are initialized.  Any such dependency in your
> program is a potential bug.
>
> That said, yes, GCC 4.7 did change the order.  See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR46770 .  You may be able to change back by
> configuring with --disable-initfini-array.  That said, this solution
> is likely to be only temporary.  The only permanent fix will be to
> remove the unsupported dependency in your C++ program.

Another option is the init_priority attribute documented at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Attributes.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux