On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/26/2014 05:17 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Any objections to changing it to "this warning is enabled by default"
or "warning enabled by default"? Or is that too verbose?
The second one looks fine to me, need to find a real reviewer now ;-)
We should show the flag that enables the warning, so that users can use the
-Wno- variant to disable it if they want. Or does "enabled by default" mean
that no such -Wno- flag exists?
Exactly. -std=c++11 is the right way to make this warning quiet.
--
Marc Glisse
