On 13 February 2014 09:25, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/13/2014 06:22 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 13 February 2014 03:23, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> >>> >>> I think the ""f operator has not been implemented in C++1y mode, either >>> because it's not actually part of the standard or no one has found the >>> time >>> to implement it yet. >> >> >> f is not a user-defined literal operator, it's a core language feature >> present in C and C++, but not valid on integer-literals such as 42. > > > I think the expectation here is that C++14 will provide a language-defined > literal operator that will make this legal. I don't if this expectation is > warranted, not having consulted the standard. I see no such operator in the working draft. I'll ask Herb about his example later today.
