On 26 January 2014 16:17, Richard Sandiford wrote: > I can definitely sympathise with reading the message the other way though. > If that's the only output you see, the natural assumption is that the > "enabled by default" applies to the thing just before it. > > Any objections to changing it to "this warning is enabled by default" > or "warning enabled by default"? Or is that too verbose? The former seems far too verbose to me, I could live with the latter (even though it's only a few characters shorter!)
