Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Wolf <eric.wolf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:27:17 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <532AA680.2050202@abas.de> (Eric Wolf's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 +0100")

* Eric Wolf:

> We have a big bunch of C and C++ code in our product and compile
> main with g++, because I read in
>
> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq/overview-mixing-langs.html
>
> that this is needed.

This is target-dependent.  For example, GNU/Linux generally doesn't
have a problem anymore with a C main and C++ code elsewhere.

References:
- Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
  - From: Eric Wolf

Prev by Date: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Next by Date: RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Previous by thread: Re: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Next by thread: RE: Does g++ really need to compile main, if c++ code is involved?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux