Hello, I am experimenting with AVX optimization of a complex code, and discovered this simplified test-case already for scalar code: I compiled this code class MyDouble { double data; public: MyDouble (const MyDouble & v2) : data(v2.data) { ; } MyDouble (double d) : data(d) { ; } MyDouble & operator+= (MyDouble d) { data += d.data; return *this; } }; MyDouble MyFuncBad (int m, MyDouble x) { MyDouble sum = 0.0; for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) sum += x; return sum; } MyDouble MyFuncGood (int m, MyDouble x) { MyDouble sum = 0.0; for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) sum += x; return MyDouble(sum); } with 'gcc-4.8 -O3 -S testdouble.cpp' and got the assembly code below. I would expect that both functions are equivalent. In MyFuncBad, the intermediate sum is written to memory in every iteration, while in MyFuncGood just the final result is brought to memory. Is this necessary for correctness ? Can the return-value alias the call-by-value argument ? In the AVX-code the performance difference was about 30 percent. If I use the default copy-constructor, I also get the faster code. Is there something wrong with my (of course here unnecessary) copy-constructor ? Thanks a lot for an explanation Joachim The generated code is: .file "testdouble.cpp" .text .p2align 4,,15 .globl _Z9MyFuncBadi8MyDouble .type _Z9MyFuncBadi8MyDouble, @function _Z9MyFuncBadi8MyDouble: .LFB7: .cfi_startproc xorpd %xmm0, %xmm0 xorl %ecx, %ecx testl %esi, %esi movq %rdi, %rax movsd %xmm0, (%rdi) jle .L1 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L5: addsd (%rdx), %xmm0 <-- WHY RELOAD ??? addl $1, %ecx cmpl %esi, %ecx movsd %xmm0, (%rax) <-- WHY THE WRITE IN THE LOOP ???? jne .L5 .L1: rep; ret .cfi_endproc .LFE7: .size _Z9MyFuncBadi8MyDouble, .-_Z9MyFuncBadi8MyDouble .p2align 4,,15 .globl _Z10MyFuncGoodi8MyDouble .type _Z10MyFuncGoodi8MyDouble, @function _Z10MyFuncGoodi8MyDouble: .LFB8: .cfi_startproc testl %esi, %esi movq %rdi, %rax xorpd %xmm0, %xmm0 jle .L8 xorpd %xmm0, %xmm0 movsd (%rdx), %xmm1 xorl %edx, %edx .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L9: addl $1, %edx addsd %xmm1, %xmm0 cmpl %esi, %edx jne .L9 .L8: movsd %xmm0, (%rax) <---- AFTER THE LOOP ret .cfi_endproc .LFE8: .size _Z10MyFuncGoodi8MyDouble, .-_Z10MyFuncGoodi8MyDouble .ident "GCC: (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1" .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits